Here is a not-so-in-depth review of the meeting:
- During the open forum, there was some discussion of (the poor shape of) the association's finances. There seems to be, in my opinion, a disconnect between the reality and the perception of the state of the association's finances among board members and homeowners. This led to a discussion of stopping the mailing of the meeting agenda to all homeowners. The association's property manager stated that it would require a vote to make the change (note that the board's president was absent from the meeting). I questioned why a vote was required to stop the mailing when a vote was not required to start it. This led to a confused look from the property manager and at least one "jeer" from a homeowner (in my direction, not the property manager's). Ultimately, there was a vote to stop the mailing, and it passed unanimously.
- Approval of the association's finances for the month of March was tabled so that internal board matters could be discussed during executive session.
- The board approved a few small landscaping items.
- A proposal for this year's reserve study came before the board for approval. The cost seemed a bit high, and the board asked for more proposals.
You got jeered. METAL.
ReplyDeleteI refer you back to my recent comment to another post - cult of personality. Doesn't matter what you say, you're in the opposition, therefore you are WRONG!
ReplyDeleteSome people are such lemmings! (meow) (and yes, we are back to two of three for your comment posting rules. I'm good that way.)